Archive for October, 2011

Luxembourg Notes: the Eye of the Hurricane, the Land of the 1 Percent

October 10th, 2011  |  Published in Luxembourg, Politics

View of Kirschberg, Luxembourg City

Above is a view of Luxembourg City, where I’ll be living for the rest of 2011, while I’m working at the LIS Cross-National Data Center. The glass buildings looming in the distance are the banking district of Kirschberg, with a medieval wall running in front of them; I think this captures the feel of the place pretty well. I’ll get back to writing about my usual obsessions presently, but this post reflects my scattered attempts to understand the nation I’m living in.

The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is a peculiar little country–and coming from New York City, it’s a jarring transition. I’m still getting used to being in a place where everything closes by 9 PM (and nothing opens at all on Sunday), and where you actually have to look at a bus schedule before you try to get anywhere. Living with this slower pace of life kind of forces you to acknowledge that the sense of ceaseless life and possibility you get in New York is something of an illusion, made possible by the tireless work of innumerable low wage workers, who stay on the job around the clock so as to ensure that the city never sleeps. The low-commodification, shorter-hours, less wage labor kind of economy I often like to evoke would probably look more like Luxembourg. Still, the wine here is cheap and even the gas station sells great fresh baguettes, so I think I could get used to this pace of life. And of course, a lot of it is just a question of scale and density: the whole country has a population of barely 500,000, or roughly the same as Staten Island, and the capital city is less than 90,000.

Luxembourg is an especially strange place to be right now: it sort of feels like I’m in the eye of the hurricane of the European economic crisis. Daily life here seems calm and contented in one of the richest countries on earth, where GDP per capita is vastly greater than in the US and nearly three times the European Union average. According to the national statistical agency, the unemployment rate in 2010 was 4.5 percent, one of the lowest in Europe, and real GDP growth for 2011 is projected at a modest but respectable 3.4 percent. Though any economic data about Luxembourg should be taken a bit skeptically, since the majority of the country’s workforce is either foreign workers or “cross-border” workers who commute to Luxembourg from their homes in the surrounding countries.

But Luxembourg has much to fear from the gathering banking crisis in Europe. Although the national economy was once based on steel, these days banking and finance make up a quarter of the Luxembourg’s GDP. Historically, the country was known as something of a tax haven and a place for nefarious individuals to stash their money, although EU membership and post-financial crisis pressure has forced a bit of transparency on the financial sector here. Of the 146 banks in the country, just 16 are headquartered in Luxembourg: the rest are subsidiaries of foreign banks, including 43 German banks and 13 French banks. Or maybe make that 12: just today comes news of the bailout of Dexia, a French-Belgian bank whose Luxembourg division is the country’s fourth-largest private employer. Due to all the banks, investment funds, and foreign companies here, Luxembourg’s external debt–the amount owed to non-Luxembourgers by the government, companies, and individuals in the country–amounts to over $3.7 million for every single person in the country. Given all this, it’s hard to see how a financial crisis in the European banking system could be anything but catastrophic here. But it’s hard for me to say: not much is written about the effect of a crisis on Luxembourg, for the sensible reason that nobody really cares what becomes of a tiny country with a GDP the size of Uganda’s.

Politically, too, Luxembourg is right in the middle of things. While distrust of the European Union is high in much of Europe, Luxembourgers remain solid supporters of European integration. Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker of the Christian-democratic Christian Social People’s Party (CSV) has been in power here since 1995, and he has played a role in the EU out of all proportion to his diminutive country. He’s long been known as a canny political operator in the Eurozone, and recently made some news by musing on the benefits of darkness and secrecy. Just as I was arriving here, EU finance ministers were meeting in Luxembourg, in a meeting chaired by Juncker, to map out their next bumbling steps toward non-resolution of the crisis. It seems that Juncker himself favors moving in the direction of fiscal integration in Europe, and he has spoken favorably of issuing “eurobonds” as a response to the crisis; this seems to have strained his relationships with his French and German patrons.

All that seems a bit remote from daily life here, though, at least if you don’t work for a bank. As for politics within Luxembourg itself, it does exist–even if you might not always be able to tell. Like many European countries, Luxembourg is a constitutional monarchy; in this case, though, the monarch is not a king but a Grand Duke. (The back story here is that Luxembourg used to be ruled by the King of the Netherlands; however, Luxembourg’s rules of succession didn’t allow for female monarchs, so when a Queen came to power in the Netherlands control of Luxembourg passed to a Grand Duke). The Grand Duke is just a figurehead, although until recently he had the power to veto laws–a power he lost after threatening to block a euthanasia bill passed by parliament.

The elected leader, Juncker, feels a bit like a monarch himself–as I noted, he’s been in power for 16 years. At the national level, Luxembourg politics is dominated by the Christian Democrats of Juncker’s CSV, which has been the dominant party of government and held the Prime Minister’s post continually with only one brief exception since World War II. Locally, however, the other parties have their regional strengths.

I got here a week before the municipal elections, so I saw electoral posters everywhere and even ran into a few candidates drumming up votes downtown. There were seven party lists, of which three are plausibly “left”: the social-democratic Luxembourg Socialist Workers Party, the Left Party (formed by a merging of various communist and socialist forces about ten years ago) and the old Communist Party of Luxembourg:

Looking at the results of the muncipal elections this morning, I was reminded how different the geography of class looks in other countries, and how much my own intuitions about it are shaped by my parochial U.S. experience.

Americans these days are used to thinking of the inner cities as strongholds of left-liberalism, with the suburbs and rural areas as wellsprings of reaction. This, however, is not the pattern you see in a lot of European cities, where the rich and middle classes remained in the center and the working class was pushed to the fringes. Most famously, Paris is surrounded by the Red Belt: the working class suburbs that long provided the core of the French Communist Party’s support.

In Luxembourg, the social democratic and leftist parties find their greatest support in the “Red Lands”, the historic steel and iron producing heartland in the south of the country. The politics of Luxembourg City itself, in contrast, are thoroughly bourgeois. The winning party in the just-finished elections was the long-dominant Democratic Party, which is a “liberal” party in the European sense: progressive on issues like LGBT rights and abortion, and secular (unlike the ruling CSV), but committed to the neo-liberal economic line on things like deregulation and low taxes. They will govern in a coalition with the Green Party, which appears to be as ideologically slippery as its counterparts in Germany and elsewhere.

Of course, there’s a lot more to political life than electoral politics, even in the sleepy Grand Duchy. My biggest immediate regret about leaving New York was that I had to leave behind the exciting and surprising Occupy Wall Street protests; I only managed to make it down once before I left, but I found the whole scene inspiring and confusing in equal measure. For whatever reason, the movement has struck a chord, and I was amazed to turn on an Internet stream of New York’s NPR station today and find that just about every show was talking about OWS. This Saturday, there is a call for protests around the world that are in some kind of loose solidarity with OWS–including, it turns out, in Luxembourg. I’ll be tracking these folks down and seeing what they’re up to, and I’ll report back on how the events on Wall Street look to folks in the heartland of the European 1 percent.

Jacobin Live

October 6th, 2011  |  Published in Uncategorized

More non-content content until I can come up with a proper post. Jacobin magazine, hot new Leftist magazine and the home of some of my recent writings, is sponsoring its first public event!

OWS debate flyer

Time: Friday, October 14. 7 pm.

Location: Bluestockings book store. 172 Allen Street between Stanton and Rivington.

With: Jodi Dean, Doug Henwood, Malcolm Harris, and Natasha Lennard. Seth Ackerman moderates.

I won’t be there, unfortunately, because I’m thousands of miles away. But if you’re somewhat closer by, you should turn up for what promises to be a great debate about the politics, strategy, and tactics of the “Occupy [whatever]” upsurge.

Stay tuned to the Jacobin blog for updates and details.

Tune in Next Week for an All New Episode

October 3rd, 2011  |  Published in Shameless self-promotion

I’ve been preoccupied with moving out of the apartment I’ve lived in for 6 years and now I’m in the process of moving to Europe for three months, so today’s post is a clip show; regular programming will resume next week. My last post was somewhat controversial, and elicited responses from both Marcy Wheeler and DJW at Lawyers, Guns, and Money. Those deserve serious responses, but that will have to wait until I have some more time.

Meanwhile, we’re in reruns. Most of this blog’s readers have discovered it in the past few months, due to the much-appreciated publicity of folks like Matt Yglesias, Mike Konczal, and Henry Farrell (and with a special hat tip to John Boy for being the O.G. of promoting my writing when I couldn’t be bothered to do it myself). But I’ve actually been blogging on and off for years; until recently, I wrote mostly for myself and a few friends, indifferent to the possibility of finding a broader audience. But as long as you’re all here, I figured I’d point out a few of my favorite posts from this site’s pre-history, which I think at least sort of hold up. There are some elements of style and content that I wouldn’t repeat now, but I still hold to the core ideas.

  • On the Mode of Production. This one is quite old, but it’s still the best attempt I’ve come up with at expressing something I think about Marxism, and about theories of history in general, that I think is both unusual and important. The short version is that I think Marxism is a theory of capitalism, not a theory of history, and I’m skeptical that a fully trans-historical account of human societies is even possible. (Although David Graeber’s new book on debt makes a good run at one; more on that later.)

  • The Game Beyond the Game. My case for a radical rather than liberal interpretation of The Wire.

  • Idiocracy‘s Theory of the Future. This is actually high up on the list of my most-viewed posts of all time, but all of that traffic seems to be from search engines. It’s my reckoning with a movie that’s both under-appreciated and deeply fucked up, a post that belongs in the same lineage of arguments that produced my break-out hit single “Anti-Star Trek”.

  • Marx’s Theory of Alien Nation. How capitalism is like an alien invasion.

  • Art as Art, Anti-Art, Post-Art. My one and only attempt at art criticism, which is probably going to seem foolish or old hat to people who actually know about this stuff. But for what it’s worth, I once put this argument to Ad Reinhardt’s grandson (who’s a theater director), and he found it at least plausible.